For those of you building or participating in Web3 communities, we want to know what makes you move from being a holder or supporter to becoming an active contributor—and how could those mechanisms work differently when the mission is humanitarian rather than financial.
How can CIVIC build a Web3 community where people have meaningful agency and opportunities to contribute, while keeping the ecosystem anchored in its humanitarian mission rather than speculation or financial incentives?
Then, what forms of participation, governance, and on-chain engagement can create genuine value around a shared purpose?
Je suis intéressé pour cette collaboration dans la communauté et nous sommes dans la province du Sud-Kivu, à l'Est de la RD Congo. Nous aimerions aussi pour suivre la conversation
Please go ahead and give us your suggested answers to the 2 questions :-)
On the first question of how can it build a community where people have meaningful opportunities for contributions while being anchored in humanitarian efforts:
I joined, saw 3 discussion threads. Read, engaged. Had i seen a discussion thread where someone needs to get a software product done, with their desired functions explained, I could have given directions and started coding an MVP. So, have discussion threads with work that needs to be done for some organisation or individual while encompassing humanitarian purposes. For example, something as easy as a website for a specific handy family, so they can sell their handmade products online. Or as complex as a tool for identifying job opportunities and texting people on the phone when those are present in their region.
On the second question I have less answers now - what creates genuine value around a shared purpose in markets is the liquidity in the pool. Around people, it is seeing that the work done is useful, not put away on a shelf, conducive to them leading better lives.